18 October 2018   Best way to respond to the disappearance of Khashoggi - By: Daoud Kuttab

16 October 2018   Should the US Stop Enabling Israel? - By: Alon Ben-Meir


11 October 2018   Netanyahu Is Destroying Both Israel And The Palestinians - By: Alon Ben-Meir

11 October 2018   Independent journalism is on the attack - By: Daoud Kuttab


4 October 2018   Strike unites Palestinians from sea to river - By: Daoud Kuttab

2 October 2018   End of Hegemony: UN Must Reflect Changing World Order - By: Ramzy Baroud


27 September 2018   Will we see an Arab version of #WhyIDidn’tReport - By: Daoud Kuttab


26 September 2018   The Real Reasons behind Washington’s War on UNRWA - By: Ramzy Baroud

21 September 2018   The Deal Or The Debacle Of The Century? - By: Alon Ben-Meir














5 أيلول 2015   "من الأزل".. آخر كتب الراحل جونتر جراس - بقلم: المركز الألماني للإعلام (ألمانيا إنفو/ almania info)

28 November 2017

Decades of US Diplomacy Has Failed: Why the US Wants to Shut Down PLO Office

By: Ramzy Baroud
print     send by email

On November 18, just days before the 50th anniversary of United Nations Resolution 242, the US State Department took its first step towards severing its ties with the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).
 
The timing of this decision could not be any more profound.
 
The first formal contact between the US and the PLO occurred in mid-December, 1988, when US Ambassador to Tunisia, Robert H. Pelletreau Jr., picked up the phone to call the PLO headquarters in Tunis to schedule formal talks.
 
Palestinian PLO officials were 'elated' by the fact that the US made the first move, as reported by the New York Times.
 
This assertion, however, is quite misleading. For over a decade prior to that 'first move', PLO's chairman, Yasser Arafat, had to satisfy many US demands in exchange for this low-level political engagement.
 
The 'talks' in Tunisia were prolonged, before the PLO was ready to make its final concession in secret meetings in Oslo, Norway in 1993.
 
Eventually, a PLO office was opened in Washington DC. It served little purpose, aside from being an intermittent platform to arrange Washington-sponsored talks between Israeli and PLO officials. For Palestinians living in the US, it was almost invisible until the US announced its decision to possibly shut it down.
 
The American threat followed a United Nations speech last September by Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Chairman of the PLO. From an Israeli-US perspective, Abbas committed a mortal sin for seeking the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to take Israel to task regarding its human rights violations in Occupied Palestine.
 
By doing so, Abbas, not only violated a peculiar US law that forbids the PLO from seeking ICC help, but also an unspoken rule that allowed the US to engage the PLO in 1988, where the US served the rule of the political and legal frame of reference for the so-called ‘peace process.’ The UN took a backseat.
 
But even that unequal relationship proved too much for the US government, which is moving fully and unconditionally into the Israeli camp. The Trump Administration is now working to rewrite the nature of US involvement in the Middle East, and, especially, in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
 
Unfortunately, Trump’s team has no concrete strategy and no frame of reference, aiming to change 50-years of US foreign policy – unfair to Palestinians and Arabs – but has no alternative plan of its own.
 
Almost a year ago, Trump made a promise to Israel to be a more trustworthy ally than President Barack Obama, who gave Israel more money than any other US president in history. Obama, however, had violated a golden rule in the US-Israeli relationship: he did not veto a UN resolution that condemned the illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian territories.
 
Israel panicked at that unprecedented event, not because it feared that the UN Security Council would enforce its purportedly binding resolution, but because the US had, for once, refused to shield Israel from international censure.
 
Even before officially taking over the White House, the Trump team attempted to prevent UNSC Resolution 2334 from passing. It failed but, come January, it took over the Israeli-Palestinian file with a vengeance, threatening to cut off funds to Palestinians, blocking their efforts from expanding their international reach, and declaring its full and unconditional support for the rightwing government of Benjamin Netanyahu.
 
But there was more to Israeli alarm at Resolution 2334 than mere US betrayal. This Resolution - which asserted that Israeli settlements have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant violation of human rights – was partly predicated on, and clarified and added to, previous UNSC Resolution 242.
 
This means that 50 years of incessant Israeli attempts to absolve itself from any commitment to international law have failed miserably.
 
For Palestinians, and the larger Arab context, Resolution 242 marked their defeat in the war of 1967. Unsurprisingly, this Resolution has been cited in various agreements between Israel and the PLO, but only to give these agreements a veneer of international legitimacy.
 
However, the Oslo Accords of 1993 gave Israel the opportunity to use its leverage to bypass international law altogether: signing a peace agreement without ending its military occupation became the goal.
 
Against this backdrop, it is no wonder that Netanyahu was quite shocked to witness that a recommitment to Resolution 242 last year at the UNSC did not garner US opposition. Actually, the longstanding Resolution gained more substance and vigor.
 
The June 1967 war was Israel's greatest military victory, and Resolution 242 enshrined a whole new world order in the Middle East, in which the US and Israel reigned supreme. Although it called for withdrawal of Israeli military from Occupied Palestinian and Arab lands, it also paved the way for normalization between Israel and the Arabs. The Camp David Agreement between Egypt and Israel was a direct outcome of that Resolution.
 
This is why Resolution 2334 has alarmed Israel, for it invalidated all the physical changes that Israel has made in 50 years of illegal occupation of Palestinian lands.
 
The Resolution called for "two democratic States, Israel and Palestine, liv(ing) side by side in peace within secure and recognized borders".
 
Unlike Resolution 242, Resolution 2334 has left no room for clever misinterpretation: it references the pre-June 1967 lines in its annulment of the Israeli occupation and all the illegal settlements Israel has constructed since then.
 
The Resolution even cites the Fourth Geneva Convention, the UN Charter and the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of July 2004, which stated that Israel’s barrier in the West Bank was illegal and should be dismantled.
 
With international law, once more, taking center stage in a conflict which the US has long designated as if its personal business, Abbas was empowered enough to reach out to the ICC, thus raising the ire of Israel and its allies in the White House.
 
Even if the PLO’s office is permanently shut down, the decision should not just be seen as punishing Palestinians for seeking ICC support but, ultimately, as the culmination of disastrous US diplomacy, for which the Trump Administration has no clear alternative.

* Ramzy Baroud is an author and editor of Palestine Chronicle. His latest book is The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People's Struggle (Pluto Press, London). - ramzybaroud@gmail.com



Name
Email
Comment
Security Code

23 تشرين أول 2018   "التاجر" ترامب وخُطة التَشَدّد والإغراء..! - بقلم: فراس ياغي

23 تشرين أول 2018   تفويض المنظمة أم تحويلها إلى سلطة؟ - بقلم: هاني المصري

23 تشرين أول 2018   إجماع الفصائل على رفض "صاروخ غزة" - بقلم: د. أحمد جميل عزم

22 تشرين أول 2018   دلالة التصويت في الجمعية العامة - بقلم: عمر حلمي الغول

22 تشرين أول 2018   قتل جمال خاشقجي جريمة دموية سعودية لا تغتفر - بقلم: شاكر فريد حسن


22 تشرين أول 2018   "لجنة المتابعة"... هدف معارك إسرائيل القادمة - بقلم: جواد بولس

21 تشرين أول 2018   ليست إسرائيل وحدها..! - بقلم: د. إبراهيم أبراش

21 تشرين أول 2018   هل أحرق وقود كهرباء غزة فرص إنهاء الانقسام؟ - بقلم: معتصم حمادة

21 تشرين أول 2018   ما هو اخطر من الحرب على غزة؟ - بقلم: د. هاني العقاد

21 تشرين أول 2018   مسيرة العودة .. نجاح رغم التهديد - بقلم: د. أحمد الشقاقي

21 تشرين أول 2018   أحداث مخيم "المية ومية".. مسار "التهدئة" وضرورة المعالجة - بقلم: هيثم أبو الغزلان

21 تشرين أول 2018   صفقة أم كارثة القرن؟ - بقلم: د. ألون بن مئيــر

21 تشرين أول 2018   لا يلدغ المؤمن من جحر مرتين..! - بقلم: د. عبد الرحيم جاموس

21 تشرين أول 2018   قطاع غزة.. المخرج وطني..! - بقلم: علي جرادات






8 حزيران 2018   ..هكذا خسر قطاع غزة أكثر من 40% من مساحته..! - بقلم: وسام زغبر







27 اّذار 2011   عداد الدفع المسبق خال من المشاعر الإنسانية..!! - بقلم: محمد أبو علان

13 شباط 2011   سقط مبارك فعادت لنا الحياة - بقلم: خالد الشرقاوي

4 شباط 2011   لا مستحيل..!! - بقلم: جودت راشد الشويكي


19 تشرين أول 2018   كريستينا ياسر كريستينا..! - بقلم: د. أحمد جميل عزم


12 أيلول 2018   الثقافة بين التعهير والتطهير..! - بقلم: فراس حج محمد

8 أيلول 2018   حتى أسمع مخاضك..! - بقلم: حسن العاصي

7 أيلول 2018   كيف تعلم مكسيم غوركي الكتابة؟ ولماذا؟ - بقلم: فراس حج محمد


8 كانون ثاني 2011   "صحافة المواطن" نافذة للأشخاص ذوي الاعاقة - بقلم: صدقي موسى

10 تشرين ثاني 2010   رساله .. - بقلم: جودت راشد الشويكي

3 تشرين ثاني 2010   شخبطة صحفية - بقلم: حسناء الرنتيسي

27 تشرين أول 2010   المدلل .. - بقلم: جودت راشد الشويكي

21 تشرين أول 2010   فضفضة مواطنية - بقلم: حسناء الرنتيسي


4 اّذار 2012   الطقش


26 كانون ثاني 2012   امرأة في الجفتلك



 
 
 
top

English | الصفحة الرئيسية | كاريكاتير | صحف ومجلات | أخبار وتقارير | اّراء حرة | الإرشيف | صوتيات | صحفيون وكتاب | راسلنا

جميع الحقوق محفوظة © لشبكة  أمين الأعلامية 2018- 1996 
تصميم وتطوير شبكة أمين الأعلامية